From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glispy v. Wild

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 16, 1991
591 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-2828.

October 16, 1991.

Petition for writ of prohibition.

Philip J. Yacucci, Jr., Public Defender and Jan Hendrickson, Asst. Public Defender, Vero Beach, for petitioners.

No appearance for respondent.


The petition is denied.

POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.


I would grant the petition. The petitioner, Terry Glispy, is represented by the public defender's office. That office also represents two (2) prosecution witnesses. This constitutes a sufficient conflict of interest entitling petitioner to representation by independent counsel. Babb v. Edwards, 412 So.2d 859 (Fla. 1982). Further, because of the important, yet sometimes subtle, effect of such a conflict, this error is not one susceptible to full remedy by a later appeal after petitioner's case is concluded. Cf. Boudreau v. Carlisle, 549 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Babb v. Edwards.


Summaries of

Glispy v. Wild

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 16, 1991
591 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Glispy v. Wild

Case Details

Full title:TERRY GLISPY AND PHILIP J. YACUCCI, JR., PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR THE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 16, 1991

Citations

591 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Moore v. State

A trial court's denial of a criminal defendant's request to discharge appointed counsel and appoint other…