From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gliozzo v. Gliozzo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 10, 1987
503 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-2525.

March 10, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Sidney B. Shapiro, J.

Frank X. Gliozzo, in pro. per.

Conrad S. Kulatz, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


Although the evidence does not support the husband's claim that all of the sums paid towards the purchase of the entireties property in Seminole County came from his separate funds unconnected with the marital relationship, it does appear, without dispute, that the substantial down payment made by the husband came from a source unconnected with the marital relationship and that, therefore, the trial court erred in denying the husband's claim for a special equity in this property. Accordingly, the judgment of dissolution is reversed in respect to the denial of the husband's special equity in this property and affirmed in all other respects. The case is remanded to the trial court for a determination of the husband's special equity in accordance with Landay v. Landay, 429 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1983).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.


Summaries of

Gliozzo v. Gliozzo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 10, 1987
503 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Gliozzo v. Gliozzo

Case Details

Full title:FRANK X. GLIOZZO, APPELLANT, v. LYNNE FORTE GLIOZZO, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 10, 1987

Citations

503 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Wertkin v. Wertkin

Since the undisputed evidence established that both the husband and wife expended nonmarital funds to obtain…