observing that the case did not present an "appropriate circumstance," rather than an "exceptional circumstance," to exercise the court's discretion
Summary of this case from Schafer v. Kent Cnty. Dep't of Planning Servs.No. 117, 1991.
September 27, 1991.
Chancery, CA 11429.
AFFIRMED
observing that the case did not present an "appropriate circumstance," rather than an "exceptional circumstance," to exercise the court's discretion
Summary of this case from Schafer v. Kent Cnty. Dep't of Planning Servs.In Johnson, our Supreme Court upheld the Superior Court's decision to deny the admission of a co-defendant's guilty plea, even though the defendant was arguing for the admission, because the prejudicial effect to Johnson of admitting the evidence substantially outweighed its probative value.
Summary of this case from State v. CharbonneauFull title:Glinert v. Lord v. Triton Group Ltd
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Sep 27, 1991
A-147-48. 604 A.2d 417 (1991).…
Wells v. StateWe find no abuse of discretion in the trial court having excluded the use of the chart. See, e.g. Thompson by…