Glickfeld v. Venokur

Full title: ROSE GLICKFELD, RESPONDENT, v. SYLVIA A. VENOKUR, TRADING, ETC., APPELLANT

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 26, 1938

119 N.J.L. 431 (N.J. 1938)

Opinion

Argued October 23, 1937 —

Decided January 26, 1938.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 15 N.J. Mis. R. 522.

For the appellant, Fast Fast.

For the respondent, David M. Litwin and Moe A. Litwin.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.