Opinion
March, 1926.
Order setting aside verdict and granting new trial reversed upon the law, and verdict reinstated, with costs of the trial and this appeal, upon the ground that the verdict was not excessive as matter of law, and that there was no error in the disclosure by the defendants' witness of the fact of insurance in her irresponsive answer to a question put by plaintiff's counsel. Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Verdict was for $3,000. — [REP.