From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glick v. Glick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 4, 1985
112 A.D.2d 17 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

June 4, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Sullivan, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Green, O'Donnell and Pine, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in granting plaintiff permission to amend her complaint to include a cause of action to enforce a prenuptial agreement entered into in Canada, where the parties formerly resided. Although CPLR 302 (b) has been liberally construed to protect New York domiciliaries, plaintiff, a nondomiciliary, is required to show that defendant had "minimum contacts" within the State in order to satisfy due process requirements (see, International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310; Browne v. Browne, 53 A.D.2d 134, 136, appeal dismissed 40 N.Y.2d 917).


Summaries of

Glick v. Glick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 4, 1985
112 A.D.2d 17 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Glick v. Glick

Case Details

Full title:NURITH GLICK, Respondent, v. AARON GLICK, Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 4, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 17 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)