From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glick v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 8, 1976
53 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Summary

In Glick v. City of New York (53 A.D.2d 528, affd 42 N.Y.2d 831), for example, this court dismissed the claim of a plaintiff who was assaulted by a 15-year-old student in a normally locked ladies room of a New York City high school, holding that the Board of Education had no duty to protect her, despite its implementation of security measures.

Summary of this case from Logan v. City of New York

Opinion

June 8, 1976


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 18, 1975, after a jury trial, whereby it was adjudged that liability was determined in favor of the plaintiff, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and disbursements, and the complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff was assaulted on December 17, 1970 in the lady's room of the George Washington High School Annex by John Battle, a 15-year-old student at the school. This particular lady's room was normally locked, keys being issued only to teachers. How the student who committed this assault effected entry is not known. On this record it must be concluded that the defendant Board of Education of the City of New York did not violate any duty to the plaintiff. The amount of protection that may be provided citizens is limited generally by the resources of the community and by a considered legislative and executive decision as to how those resources may be deployed (see Riss v City of N.Y., 22 N.Y.2d 579; Bass v City of N.Y., 38 A.D.2d 407, affd 32 N.Y.2d 894; see, also, Diamond v Board of Educ., 12 Misc.2d 47). The internal security measures taken by the school administration consisted of assigning four paraprofessional school aides to guard the main door and patrol various other parts of the building. External security was supervised by the police. The retention of the student at the school prior to the assault, with knowledge of his record of infractions of the school's rules and regulations, is not under the circumstances herein a sufficient basis for affixing liability upon the defendant board. Battle was enrolled in the college-bound program. The board had to retain this student within the school system. Before he could be admitted to a 600 school, there had to be extensive and intensive efforts by the "home" school directed toward the adjustment and therapy of said student. Transfer or suspension is utilized when other remedies fail. The determination to retain Battle in a rehabilitative effort in which the co-operation of Battle's mother was enlisted, rather than to suspend or transfer him to a 600 school, was reasonable under all the circumstances presented by this record. In the circumstances herein, the complaint is dismissed as a matter of law.

Concur — Lupiano, J.P., Birns, Silverman, Lane and Nunez, JJ.


Summaries of

Glick v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 8, 1976
53 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

In Glick v. City of New York (53 A.D.2d 528, affd 42 N.Y.2d 831), for example, this court dismissed the claim of a plaintiff who was assaulted by a 15-year-old student in a normally locked ladies room of a New York City high school, holding that the Board of Education had no duty to protect her, despite its implementation of security measures.

Summary of this case from Logan v. City of New York
Case details for

Glick v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES GLICK, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 8, 1976

Citations

53 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Rubino v. City of New York

The dichotomy between "governmental" and "proprietary" functions exercised by a public entity has evoked…

McEnaney v. State

s duty to provide police protection is ordinarily one owed to the public at large and not to any particular…