From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glick v. Chukchansi Fin. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2021
1:20-cv-01074-DAD-HBK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01074-DAD-HBK

09-01-2021

PAULA S. GLICK, Plaintiff, v. CHUKCHANSI FINANCIAL COMPANY, LLC., et. al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE (DOC. NO. 22)

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review of the file. On July 29, 2021, the Court entered an order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss and directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint within twenty-one days from service of the order. (Doc. No. 22). That time has expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint nor sought additional time.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Within fourteen (14) days from receipt of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to timely respond to this order will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice.


Summaries of

Glick v. Chukchansi Fin. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2021
1:20-cv-01074-DAD-HBK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Glick v. Chukchansi Fin. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PAULA S. GLICK, Plaintiff, v. CHUKCHANSI FINANCIAL COMPANY, LLC., et. al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 1, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-01074-DAD-HBK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)