In Glens Falls Paper Company v. White (58 How. Pr. 174) it was said that "To subject a party to arrest the cause of action must be a fine or penalty, and not something of a penal character."
Summary of this case from Staub v. MyersArgued June 15, 1880
Decided June 18, 1880
S. Brown, for appellant.
Leon Abbott, for respondent.
AGREE to dismiss appeal.
No opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.
In Glens Falls Paper Company v. White (58 How. Pr. 174) it was said that "To subject a party to arrest the cause of action must be a fine or penalty, and not something of a penal character."
Summary of this case from Staub v. MyersFull title:THE GLENS FALLS PAPER COMPANY, Appellant, v . WILLIAM H. WHITE, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 18, 1880
We think the contention cannot be sustained. In Glens Falls Paper Company v. White (58 How. Pr. 174) it was…
Staub v. HenryThis view is not at variance with that expressed in Meech v. Stoner, supra; for taking into consideration the…