From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glenn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 28, 2020
603 S.W.3d 927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

WD 83094

07-28-2020

Mario L. GLENN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Irene C. Karns, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Nathan J. Aquino, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Irene C. Karns, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Nathan J. Aquino, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Four: Cynthia L. Martin, Chief Judge, Presiding, Alok Ahuja, Judge and W. Douglas Thomson, Judge

ORDER

Per curiam:

Mario Glenn appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Glenn argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because trial counsel provided ineffective assistance when counsel failed to investigate Glenn's claim that a large sum of money discovered on him at the time of Glenn's arrest was from a settlement with Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Glenn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 28, 2020
603 S.W.3d 927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Glenn v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mario L. GLENN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jul 28, 2020

Citations

603 S.W.3d 927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)