Glenn v. State

5 Citing cases

  1. Holiman v. State

    313 Ga. App. 76 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 7 times

    Taken together, the evidence in the record tends to show a connection between Jamison and the contraband sufficient to prove that he knowingly shared with his brother the power and intention to exercise dominion or control over the cocaine mixture. See Glenn v. State, 251 Ga.App. 336, 337–338(1), 553 S.E.2d 323 (2001). As for the contention that Jamison did not have constructive possession of the mixture found in the second bedroom—even if he did have constructive possession of the mixture found in the kitchen—it appears to be premised on the notion that the second bedroom was that of Royrecaus.

  2. Richardson v. State

    277 Ga. App. 429 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 2 times

    Since there was evidence to support the verdict, the court did not err when it denied Richardson's motion for a directed verdict. See Glenn v. State, 251 Ga. App. 336, 337-338 (1) ( 553 SE2d 323) (2001) (evidence of constructive possession was sufficient where officers saw drug paraphernalia and residue in plain view after defendant opened door to apartment). 3. Richardson next contends that the trial court erred when it delivered the pattern jury charge on corroboration of testimony by an accomplice.

  3. Barrow v. State

    269 Ga. App. 635 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 11 times
    Ruling that a Batson challenge made after the jury has been impaneled and sworn is untimely

    This is particularly true here, where the police recovered 24.91 grams of cocaine, but the evidence shows that Barrow threw away blocks of suspected cocaine that the officers were unable to recover. Glenn v. State, 251 Ga.App. 336, 338-339(2), 553 S.E.2d 323 (2001). See id.; Watkins v. State, 253 Ga.App. 382, 385(3), 559 S.E.2d 133 (2002).

  4. Myers v. State

    602 S.E.2d 327 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 2 times

    In Bethea v. State, cited by Myers, no such expert testimony was presented and therefore the evidence of defendant's possessing 13 rocks of cocaine was alone insufficient to show intent to distribute. Glenn v. State, 251 Ga. App. 336, 338-339 (2) ( 553 SE2d 323) (2001).Guild v. State, 234 Ga. App. 862, 870 (10) (b) ( 508 SE2d 231) (1998).

  5. Bussey v. State

    587 S.E.2d 134 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 14 times

    The State may present expert testimony that a specific amount of drugs is greater than a person would possess for personal use. See Glenn v. State, 251 Ga. App. 336, 338-339(2) ( 553 S.E.2d 323) (2001). While Agent Hemphill was not officially tendered as an expert witness, Bussey did not object to his testimony.