From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glenn v. Pruet

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 19, 1919
82 So. 556 (Ala. Crim. App. 1919)

Opinion

7 Div. 511.

March 18, 1919. On Final Hearing, June 19, 1919.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay County; A.H. Alston, Judge.

Action in assumpsit by F.D. Pruet against A.J. Glenn and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Dismissed.

Riddle Riddle, of Talladega, for appellants.

Cornelius Vann and Lackey Rowland, all of Ashland, for appellee.


The record in this case, as pertains to the bill of exceptions, has been mutilated, and has the appearance of having been so mutilated and changed after its preparation and certification by the clerk of the court, and the transcript as presented has not been prepared in conformity with Supreme Court rule 26 (61 South. vii), Code of 1907, p. 1512. Under former rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the record might well be stricken and the cause dismissed, but in order that no injustice be done and that the appellant may acquit himself of fault, the order of submission will be set aside, the cause restored to the docket, and a citation issue to the appellant, or his attorney of record, to show cause why the bill of exceptions should not be stricken.

175 Ala. xix.

Let the submission be set aside and the cause restored to the docket and a citation issue to the parties, or their attorneys of record, as above indicated.

On Final Hearing.


For the reason stated in the foregoing opinion, this cause is finally dismissed.


Summaries of

Glenn v. Pruet

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 19, 1919
82 So. 556 (Ala. Crim. App. 1919)
Case details for

Glenn v. Pruet

Case Details

Full title:GLENN et al. v. PRUET

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 19, 1919

Citations

82 So. 556 (Ala. Crim. App. 1919)
82 So. 556

Citing Cases

Mauney v. Electric Const. Co.

Any material alteration of a bill of exceptions by a party to the cause, without consent of the opposing…

American Federation of State, C. M. Emp. v. Dawkins

261 Ala. XIX, Rule 27. See Glenn v. Pruet, 17 Ala. App. 108, 82 So. 556. Rule 24 states that the style of the…