From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Island v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 18, 2015
No. 08 CR 401-11 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2015)

Opinion

No. 08 CR 401-11

11-18-2015

GLENN ISLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This is one of a series of cases in which sentences were (to some degree) reconsidered in light of a change in Guidelines. In this instance, I think the operative Guideline is the one that applies to career offenders. That Guideline, which I used at the original sentencing, has not changed. Therefore, I do not have the authority to change this sentence. But even if I did have that authority, I would impose the same sentence I handed down when the initial judgment was entered. When I resentenced the defendant, I explicitly stated that I would not change the sentence even if it were to be imposed under Amendment 782 Guideline. In simple terms, I reaffirm my judgment that the appropriate term of imprisonment is 204 months.

ENTER:

/s/

James B. Zagel

United States District Judge
DATE: November 18, 2015


Summaries of

Island v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 18, 2015
No. 08 CR 401-11 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Island v. United States

Case Details

Full title:GLENN ISLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 18, 2015

Citations

No. 08 CR 401-11 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2015)