From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glenewinkel v. M.D. Carvajal

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Nov 6, 2023
3:21-cv-2524-E (BT) (N.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2023)

Opinion

3:21-cv-2524-E (BT)

11-06-2023

JAY E. GLENEWINKEL Plaintiff, v. M.D. CARVAJAL, ET AL. Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ADA E. BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Defendant Andrew Ratliff's motion to dismiss the individual-capacity medical indifference claims against him (Doc. 38) is GRANTED. By separate judgment, the plaintiff's claims against Ratliff and all other defendants will be DISMISSED. See Doc. 22 at 1 (ordering dismissal of all claims except for the individual-capacity claims against Ratliff but not issuing a partial judgment at that time).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Glenewinkel v. M.D. Carvajal

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Nov 6, 2023
3:21-cv-2524-E (BT) (N.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Glenewinkel v. M.D. Carvajal

Case Details

Full title:JAY E. GLENEWINKEL Plaintiff, v. M.D. CARVAJAL, ET AL. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Nov 6, 2023

Citations

3:21-cv-2524-E (BT) (N.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2023)