From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gleason v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Aug 31, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0734 SECTION P (W.D. La. Aug. 31, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0734 SECTION P

08-31-2020

PAUL A. GLEASON v. PAT SMITH


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

RULING

On August 17, 2020, Magistrate Judge Hayes issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 5] recommending that Plaintiff's civil rights action be dismissed without prejudice for failing to comply with her order to amend his Complaint [Doc. No. 4].

In response, Plaintiff filed an objection [Doc. No. 6]. In his objection, Plaintiff contends that he has been unable to obtain his medical records. However, Magistrate Judge Hayes did not asked that he provide medical records at this time. Rather, she asked that he amend his Complaint to provide more facts related to his claim. Plaintiff did not offer any reason why he failed to comply with her Order, nor did he offer additional facts as part of his objection. Accordingly, after a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that Magistrate Judge Hayes' Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted. The Court will dismiss his case without prejudice.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 31st day of August, 2020

/s/_________

TERRY A. DOUGHTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gleason v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Aug 31, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0734 SECTION P (W.D. La. Aug. 31, 2020)
Case details for

Gleason v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:PAUL A. GLEASON v. PAT SMITH

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 31, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0734 SECTION P (W.D. La. Aug. 31, 2020)