From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gleason v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 7, 2021
2:21-cv-00253-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00253-TLN-AC

07-07-2021

STANLEY GLEASON, Plaintiff, v. JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

Plaintiff Stanley Gleason (“Plaintiff”), a former inmate at California State Prison - Sacramento, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 19, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has not filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued May 19, 2021 (ECF No. 7), are ADOPTED IN FULL, and

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gleason v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 7, 2021
2:21-cv-00253-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Gleason v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY GLEASON, Plaintiff, v. JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 7, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00253-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2021)