From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glazik v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 2003
306 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-09726

Argued June 9, 2003.

June 30, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants New York City School Construction Authority and Plato Construction appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated September 25, 2002, as granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240(1), and denied those branches of their cross motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6) causes of action.

Ahmuty, Demers McManus, Albertson, N.Y. (Brendan T. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for appellants.

Edelman Edelman, New York, N.Y. (Barbara M. Berk of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof granting the motion and substituting therefor a provision denying the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment.

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, LUCIANO and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Glazik v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 2003
306 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Glazik v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ANDRZEJ GLAZIK, respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL., defendants, NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 30, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
761 N.Y.S.2d 863