From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glaze v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 27, 2012
No. 1153 C.D. 2010 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Apr. 27, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1122 C.D. 2010 No. 1123 C.D. 2010 No. 1124 C.D. 2010 No. 1153 C.D. 2010 No. 1154 C.D. 2010 No. 1155 C.D. 2010 No. 1156 C.D. 2010 No. 1157 C.D. 2010 No. 1158 C.D. 2010 No. 1159 C.D. 2010 No. 1160 C.D. 2010 No. 1161 C.D. 2010 No. 1162 C.D. 2010 No. 1163 C.D. 2010 No. 1164 C.D. 2010 No. 1165 C.D. 2010 No. 1166 C.D. 2010 No. 1167 C.D. 2010 No. 1168 C.D. 2010 No. 1169 C.D. 2010 No. 1170 C.D. 2010 No. 1171 C.D. 2010 No. 1172 C.D. 2010 No. 1173 C.D. 2010 No. 1174 C.D. 2010 No. 1175 C.D. 2010 No. 11

04-27-2012

Alfred Glaze, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent James McHugh, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent Thomas Fouch, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Ungerman), Respondent Thomas Kuczyinski Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent John Trenz, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent Kenneth Ruckel, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh) ,Respondent Theodore Belajac, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent John A. Marks, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent John Ungerman, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent Robert Shuster, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent James Howard, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Shuster), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Fouch), Respondent Leroy Mobley, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent Joseph Buckley, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Glaze), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Trenz), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Howard), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Divosevic),Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (McHugh), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Jarzynka), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Lennon-Spangler), Respondent Lucia Lennon-Spangler, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Moran), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Mobley), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Dayton), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Marks), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Kuczyinski), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Ruckel), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Belajac), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Buckley), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Campbell), Respondent Robert Moran, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent Michael Dayton, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent David Divosevic, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent Jeffrey Campbell, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), Respondent


ORDER

NOW, April 27, 2012, having considered respondents' application for reargument en banc and the answers filed by designated petitioner City of Pittsburgh and respondent UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., the application is denied.

BY THE COURT:

_________________

DAN PELLEGRINI,

President Judge


Summaries of

Glaze v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 27, 2012
No. 1153 C.D. 2010 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Apr. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Glaze v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

Case Details

Full title:Alfred Glaze, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of…

Court:COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 27, 2012

Citations

No. 1153 C.D. 2010 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Apr. 27, 2012)