From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glaze v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 5, 2006
928 So. 2d 540 (La. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2005-C-1734.

May 5, 2006.

In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; — Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers' Compensation — District 3, No. 04-02411; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. WCA 05-72.


Writ denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., and TRAYLOR, J., would grant.

VICTORY, J., dissents from the writ denial and assigns reasons.


While stating that payment of workers's compensation benefits does not constitute an admission that they are owed, the court of appeal failed to apply the statute. Since Wal-Mart has disputed that an accident occurred and plaintiff was disabled as a result, there can be no penalty or attorneys' fees at this time for failure to pay the correct amount of benefits. Wal-Mart may prevail at the trial of the case on the merits that there was no accident and/or no resulting disability and no workers' compensation is owed. Surely, an employer cannot be penalized for failing to pay the "correct" amount of benefits, when no benefits are owed.

I would grant Wal-Mart's writ application.


Summaries of

Glaze v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 5, 2006
928 So. 2d 540 (La. 2006)
Case details for

Glaze v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:April GLAZE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: May 5, 2006

Citations

928 So. 2d 540 (La. 2006)

Citing Cases

Ryan v. Cajun Indus.

Ardoin v. Kipling Korner Grocery, 02-1372, pp. 2-3 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/5/03), 839 So.2d 1167, 1168-69…