From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glaze v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 30, 1984
325 S.E.2d 172 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

69363.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 30, 1984.

Simple battery. Gwinnett State Court. Before Judge Winegarden.

Theodore S. Worozbyt, William A. Morrison, for appellant.

Herbert T. Jenkins, Jr., Solicitor, Carey M. Cameron, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.


James E. Glaze, Jr., appeals from his conviction of simple battery contending the trial court erred in allowing him to waive his right to counsel without insuring that the waiver was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. Held:

The record indicates that before trial Glaze signed a form entitled "Waiver of Rights for Trial Without a Jury" and initialed the section which states: "I do not desire a lawyer appointed or employed, and waive the right to have an appointed lawyer or employed lawyer to represent me." Just prior to trial, the court briefly examined the defendant about the waiver and merely inquired of the defendant as to whether he had read it, understood it, and if he was ready to proceed. Glaze answered all three questions in the affirmative.

In Clarke v. Zant, 247 Ga. 194, 197 ( 275 S.E.2d 49) (1981), the court held that where a defendant proceeds to trial and represents himself the record should reflect that the trial court made the defendant aware of the danger of proceeding without counsel. See also Horton v. State, 161 Ga. App. 664 ( 289 S.E.2d 788) (1982) and Fernandez v. State, 171 Ga. App. 290 ( 319 S.E.2d 503) (1984). As appellant was not warned of the danger of proceeding without counsel, we must reverse.

Judgment reversed. McMurray, C. J., and Sognier, J., concur.


DECIDED NOVEMBER 30, 1984.


Summaries of

Glaze v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 30, 1984
325 S.E.2d 172 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Glaze v. State

Case Details

Full title:GLAZE v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 30, 1984

Citations

325 S.E.2d 172 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
325 S.E.2d 172

Citing Cases

In re B. M. H

"In Clarke v. Zant, 247 Ga. 194, 197 ( 275 S.E.2d 49) (1981), the court held that where a defendant proceeds…

Strozier v. State

We therefore hold ... the record should reflect a finding on the part of the trial court that the defendant…