From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glauser v. Twilio, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 14, 2011
Case No. 4:11-cv-02584-PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 4:11-cv-02584-PJH

10-14-2011

BRIAN GLAUSER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, v. TWILIO, INC., a Delaware corporation; and GROUPME, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants.

BRYAN A. MERRYMAN (134357) J. JONATHAN HAWK (254350) WHITE & CASE LLP BIJAL VAKIL (192878) JEREMY OSTRANDER (233489) WHITE & CASE LLP Attorneys for Defendant GROUPME, INC. PATRICK S. THOMPSON (160804) ANNA HSIA (234179) AUDREY M. LIN (271671) GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Attorneys for Defendant TWILIO, INC. SEAN P. REIS (184044) E DELSON JAY EDELSON (PHV) RAFEY S. BALABANIAN (PHV) CHRISTOPHER L. DORE (PHV) E DELSON Attorneys for Plaintiff and Putative Classes


BRYAN A. MERRYMAN (134357)

J. JONATHAN HAWK (254350)

WHITE & CASE LLP

BIJAL VAKIL (192878)

JEREMY OSTRANDER (233489)

WHITE & CASE LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

GROUPME, INC.

PATRICK S. THOMPSON (160804)

ANNA HSIA (234179)

AUDREY M. LIN (271671)

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Attorneys for Defendant TWILIO, INC.

SEAN P. REIS (184044)

EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP

JAY EDELSON (PHV)

RAFEY S. BALABANIAN (PHV)

CHRISTOPHER L. DORE (PHV)

EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Putative Classes

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING THE PARTIES' BRIEFING SCHEDULE

ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT


Complaint Filed: May 27, 2011

Trial Date: None set.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Brian Glauser, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants GroupMe, Inc. ("GroupMe") and Twilio, Inc. (collectively referred to herein as the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to modify the Parties' briefing schedule as it pertains to both Defendants' Motions to Dismiss the Amended Complaint as follows:

WHEREAS, on September 15, 2011, Plaintiff filed his amended complaint against GroupMe and Twilio alleging violations of the TCPA.

WHEREAS, on September 29, 2011, this Court entered an order extending Defendant GroupMe's time to respond to Plaintiff's amended Complaint.

WHEREAS, on September 29, 2011, Twilio moved to dismiss the amended complaint.

WHEREAS, on October 6, 2011, GroupMe also moved to dismiss the amended complaint.

WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 7-3(a), the deadline to file any opposition to Twilio's motion is October 13, 2011, and the deadline to file any opposition to GroupMe's motion is October 20, 2011.

WHEREAS, in the interests of justice and in an effort to enhance judicial efficiency and preserve resources, the Parties have agreed to extend Plaintiff's time to file his opposition to Twilio's motion by one-week, to October 20, 2011, to correspond with the deadline to file his opposition to GroupMe's motion. The Parties have further agreed to extend Defendants' deadline to file any reply brief to November 3, 2011.

WHEREAS, this extension is not sought for any improper purpose.

WHEREAS, the extension of time sought will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court Order.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE and AGREE, subject to the approval of the Court, that:

1. Plaintiff shall have until October 20, 2011, to file any opposition papers to Defendants Twilio's and GroupMe's respective motions to dismiss;

2. Defendants shall have until November 3, 2011, to file any reply papers in support of their respective motions to dismiss.

Dated: October 12, 2011

Respectfully submitted,

WHITE & CASE LLP

J. Jonathan Hawk

Attorneys for Defendant GroupMe, Inc.

EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC

Rafey S. Balabanian

Attorneys for Plaintiff Brian Glauser

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Patrick S. Thompson

Attorneys for Defendant Twilio, Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Christopher L. Dore, an attorney, hereby certify that on October 12, 2011, I served the above and foregoing Joint Stipulation Extending the Parties' Briefing Schedule on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Amended Complaint, by causing true and accurate copies of such paper to be filed and transmitted to all counsel of record via the Court's CM/ECF electronic filing system.

/s/ Christopher L. Dore


Summaries of

Glauser v. Twilio, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 14, 2011
Case No. 4:11-cv-02584-PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Glauser v. Twilio, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN GLAUSER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

Case No. 4:11-cv-02584-PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)