From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glass v. Youngblood

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 2, 2022
2:22-cv-1928 DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1928 DB P

11-02-2022

JAMES GLASS, Plaintiff, v. DONNY YOUNGBLOOD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBOFAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged violations took place in Kern County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Glass v. Youngblood

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 2, 2022
2:22-cv-1928 DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Glass v. Youngblood

Case Details

Full title:JAMES GLASS, Plaintiff, v. DONNY YOUNGBLOOD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 2, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-1928 DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)