From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glass v. Glass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 1988
138 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

March 21, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On appeal, the plaintiff contends that the pendente lite award of maintenance and child support was excessive. A review of the record, which consists of conflicting affidavits, establishes that the Supreme Court considered all of the relevant factors and that the award made, given the parties' preseparation standard of living and the plaintiff's alleged financial circumstances, is not excessive (see, Cohen v. Cohen, 129 A.D.2d 550).

Contrary to the plaintiff's contentions, the court did not, upon our review of the record, improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding defendant a $3,000 accountant's fee (see, Perez v. Perez, 131 A.D.2d 451, 452; Ahern v. Ahern, 94 A.D.2d 53, 58).

Our determination with respect to the court's pendente lite award is to have no bearing on the ultimate award of maintenance, if any, and child support to be made after trial (see, Van Ess v Van Ess, 100 A.D.2d 848, 849). Finally, we urge the parties to take all necessary steps to bring this matter to trial as soon as is practicable. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Glass v. Glass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 1988
138 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Glass v. Glass

Case Details

Full title:ALAN GLASS, Appellant, v. BARBARA GLASS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 21, 1988

Citations

138 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Gerst v. Gerst

On the record before us, consisting of conflicting affidavits concerning the parties' relative financial…

Barasch v. Barasch

Thus, the issuance of a preliminary injunction was unwarranted. The award of counsel and expert fees does not…