From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glass v. First Rail Response

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 2, 2022
21cv984 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2022)

Opinion

21cv984 (DLC)

03-02-2022

LYNN GLASS, Plaintiff, v. FIRST RAIL RESPONSE and EDWARD HERBST, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE

DENISE COTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

It having been reported to this Court that this case has been settled, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the application to restore the action is made by April 1, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).


Summaries of

Glass v. First Rail Response

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 2, 2022
21cv984 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Glass v. First Rail Response

Case Details

Full title:LYNN GLASS, Plaintiff, v. FIRST RAIL RESPONSE and EDWARD HERBST…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

21cv984 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2022)