Thus, we conclude that Dean's initial decision to approach the vehicle and speak with Kizzee and Appellant was not a seizure triggering Fourth Amendment protection. See id.; Glaspie v. State, No. 12-18-00230-CR, 2019 WL 3024766, at *2 (Tex. App.—Tyler July 10, 2019, pet. ref'd) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that Appellant was not unlawfully seized, we overrule Appellant's fourth issue.