From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glasper v. Kent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Aug 4, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-98-P (W.D. La. Aug. 4, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-98-P

08-04-2016

ANTHONY W. GLASPER v. WARDEN KENT


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, including written objections filed by Petitioner, and determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, sua sponte, because it is time-barred by the one-year limitation period imposed by the AEDPA.

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings for the U.S. District Courts requires the district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. The court, after considering the record in this case and the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. Section 2253, denies a certificate of appealability because the applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 4th day of August, 2016.

/s/ _________

ELIZABETH ERNY FOOTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Glasper v. Kent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Aug 4, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-98-P (W.D. La. Aug. 4, 2016)
Case details for

Glasper v. Kent

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY W. GLASPER v. WARDEN KENT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Aug 4, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-98-P (W.D. La. Aug. 4, 2016)