From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glasgow v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Mar 3, 2022
5:22-cv-65-TPB-PRL (M.D. Fla. Mar. 3, 2022)

Opinion

5:22-cv-65-TPB-PRL

03-03-2022

ALVIN GLASGOW, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

TOM BARBER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Petitioner, a federal inmate incarcerated at the Coleman Federal Correctional Complex, initiated this civil action by filing a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1). In November 2015, a jury in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, found Petitioner guilty of ten counts related to the distribution of controlled substances and possession of firearms. See United States v. Glasgow, 675 Fed.Appx. 237 (4th Cir. 2017). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Petitioner's judgment in 2017. Id. He is currently in BOP custody, with a release date of June 2109. See Federal Bureau of Prisons, Inmate Search, available at www.bop.gov (last visited March 3, 2022).

In his § 2241 Petition, Petitioner challenges the legality of his incarceration and argues he is actually innocent of the crimes for which he was convicted. See generally Doc. 1.

Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[i]f the court determines at any time that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action.” See also Rule 12, Rules Governing Section 2255 proceedings. The Eleventh Circuit has held that 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is not available to challenge the validity of a sentence except on very narrow grounds. McCarthan v. Director of Goodwill Industries-Suncoast, Inc., 851 F.3d 1076, 1079 (11th Cir. 2017); Bernard v. FCC Coleman Warden, 686 Fed.Appx. 730 (11th Cir. 2017) (citing McCarthan, 851 F.3d at 1092-93). None of those grounds are present in this case, and thus Petitioner is not entitled to proceed under § 2241. As such, this case is due to be dismissed.

Further, a review of Petitioner's pending cases shows he currently has a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 action pending in the Eastern District of Virginia. See Glasgow v. United States, No. 1:19-cv-82-LO (E.D. Va.). Petitioner should file his current claims with the Eastern District of Virginia in that pending case.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

2. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Glasgow v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Mar 3, 2022
5:22-cv-65-TPB-PRL (M.D. Fla. Mar. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Glasgow v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN GLASGOW, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Mar 3, 2022

Citations

5:22-cv-65-TPB-PRL (M.D. Fla. Mar. 3, 2022)