Opinion
Argued October 26, 1933 —
Decided January 5, 1934.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 707.
For the appellant, Ranzenhofer Ranzenhofer.
For the respondent, Robert E. Pollan.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, DILL, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.