From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glanblocky v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 30, 2009
CASE NO. C09-5149JRC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 30, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. C09-5149JRC.

March 30, 2009


AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS


Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $350.00 filing fee.

The clerk is directed to issue summonses submitted by plaintiff to enable plaintiff to properly serve copies of the complaint on the appropriate parties. Plaintiff shall note that it is her responsibility to properly serve copies of the complaint along with an appropriate summons as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Glanblocky v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 30, 2009
CASE NO. C09-5149JRC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Glanblocky v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MELISSA M. GLANBLOCKY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Mar 30, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. C09-5149JRC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 30, 2009)