From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gladstone v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1966
224 N.E.2d 727 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued November 29, 1966

Decided December 30, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, HAROLD R. SODEN, J.

Adolph I. King for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Ruth V. Iles and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Judge KEATING dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: While I agree that there was no negligence proved as to the condition of the high-way, the rotted and decayed condition of the guardrails, initially erected between 1913 and 1916, which it was the duty of the State to maintain, justified the award to claimant by the Court of Claims Judge. The happening of such an accident was foreseeable. There was no evidence of contributory negligence on the part of claimant. (See Countryman v. State of New York, 251 App. Div. 509, affd. 277 N.Y. 586; Sanders v. State of New York, 191 Misc. 248, affd. 274 App. Div. 842, affd. 298 N.Y. 850.)


Summaries of

Gladstone v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1966
224 N.E.2d 727 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

Gladstone v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH GLADSTONE, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 30, 1966

Citations

224 N.E.2d 727 (N.Y. 1966)
224 N.E.2d 727
278 N.Y.S.2d 222

Citing Cases

Stuart-Bullock v. State

rts should not be permitted to review determinations of governmental planning bodies under the guise of…

Lyle v. State of New York

the Uniform Traffic Control Manual's provision (15 NYCRR 231.1 [c] [1]) which requires a curve sign where…