From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Givens v. Tesluk

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 13, 2022
2:20-CV-0930-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-CV-0930-KJM-DMC-P

06-13-2022

FRANCOIS P. GIVENS, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY C. TESLUK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 36, for sanctions.

In his motion, Plaintiff seeks imposition of sanctions against defense counsel for prematurely issuing subpoenas. Plaintiff's motion is denied because, as explained in the Court's March 31, 2022, order, ECF No. 47, defense counsel withdrew the subpoenas and no records were produced in response to the subpoenas. The record simply does not demonstrate any sanctionable conduct on the part of defense counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Givens v. Tesluk

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 13, 2022
2:20-CV-0930-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Givens v. Tesluk

Case Details

Full title:FRANCOIS P. GIVENS, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY C. TESLUK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 13, 2022

Citations

2:20-CV-0930-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)