From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Givens v. Cerliano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Dec 21, 2020
No. 6:20-cv-00508 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 21, 2020)

Opinion

No. 6:20-cv-00508

12-21-2020

Henry Lee Givens, Plaintiff, v. Maxey Cerliano, Defendant.


ORDER

This civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied, and the case be dismissed, with prejudice, for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Doc. 4.

The magistrate judge further recommended that if plaintiff pays the full filing fee within fifteen days of the date of the dismissal order, the lawsuit would proceed as though the full filing fee had been paid from the outset. Doc. 4. As of the date of this order, plaintiff has not objected to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations. Douglass v. United States Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. The court orders that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied. Plaintiff's civil action is dismissed with prejudice for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

So ordered by the court on December 21, 2020.

/s/_________

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Givens v. Cerliano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Dec 21, 2020
No. 6:20-cv-00508 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Givens v. Cerliano

Case Details

Full title:Henry Lee Givens, Plaintiff, v. Maxey Cerliano, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Dec 21, 2020

Citations

No. 6:20-cv-00508 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 21, 2020)