From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Given v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 27, 2006
164 F. App'x 638 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted Jan. 23, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

John Gary Given, Sr., Joshua Tree, CA, pro se.

Michele Louise Given, Joshua Tree, CA, pro se.

Donna J. Ford, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, Marion E. Erickson, Esq., Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Robert J. Timlin, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-00075-RJT.

Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Given v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 27, 2006
164 F. App'x 638 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Given v. United States

Case Details

Full title:John Gary GIVEN, Sr.; et al., Plaintiffs--Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 27, 2006

Citations

164 F. App'x 638 (9th Cir. 2006)