From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gitto v. A.W. Chesterton Co., Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 20, 2010
Consolidated Under MDL DOCKET NO 875, Civil Action No. 07-73417 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 20, 2010)

Opinion

Consolidated Under MDL DOCKET NO 875, Civil Action No. 07-73417.

August 20, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 19th day of August 2010 it is hereby ORDERED that Crane Co.'s Objections to the Magistrate Judges' Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 94) are OVERRULED.

It is further ORDERED that the Magistrate Judges' Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 93) is ADOPTED and Defendant Crane Co.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 44), filed on January 8, 2010, is DENIED in part.

It is further ORDERED that Crane Co.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 93) on the issue of a "bare metal" defense is DENIED without prejudice.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gitto v. A.W. Chesterton Co., Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 20, 2010
Consolidated Under MDL DOCKET NO 875, Civil Action No. 07-73417 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Gitto v. A.W. Chesterton Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SALVATORE GITTO and PHYLLIS GITTO Plaintiff, v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO., INC…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 20, 2010

Citations

Consolidated Under MDL DOCKET NO 875, Civil Action No. 07-73417 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 20, 2010)

Citing Cases

Killyer v. ABB, Inc. (In re Asbestos Litig.)

(Id., Ex. 4 at 37) Although Copes is not liable for component products it did not manufacture or sell, an…