From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gittens v. Higdon

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 27, 2023
No. 23-1053 (4th Cir. Jul. 27, 2023)

Opinion

23-1053

07-27-2023

JAMAAL A. GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEVE HIGDON, District Attorney, Union County Judge; CHELSEY WILSON, Union County Defendants - Appellees.

Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: July 25, 2023.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, (3:22-cv-00165-FDW-DCK), at Charlotte Frank D. Whitney, District Judge.

Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamaal A. Gittens appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Gittens v. Higdon, No. 3:22-cv-00165-FDW-DCK (W.D. N.C. Jan. 10, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Gittens v. Higdon

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 27, 2023
No. 23-1053 (4th Cir. Jul. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Gittens v. Higdon

Case Details

Full title:JAMAAL A. GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEVE HIGDON, District…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 27, 2023

Citations

No. 23-1053 (4th Cir. Jul. 27, 2023)