Gittens v. Equifax

Full title: JAMAAL GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EQUIFAX, Defendant - Appellee…

Court: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 20, 2020

No. 19-2340 (4th Cir. Apr. 20, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-2340

04-20-2020

JAMAAL GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EQUIFAX, Defendant - Appellee, and TRANSUNION, Defendant.

Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00228-FDW-DSC) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN, Circuit Judge.^* Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

* The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2018). --------

Jamaal Gittens appeals from the district court's order dismissing his lawsuit against Equifax without prejudice for insufficient service of process. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gittens v. Equifax, No. 3:16-cv-00228-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED