From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gitler v. City of Oak Park

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 1, 2012
Case Number 12-10245 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number 12-10245

11-01-2012

PAT GITLER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF OAK PARK, Defendant.


Honorable David M. Lawson

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE, AND DENYING

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS MOOT

Presently before the Court is the report issued on October 12, 2012 by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that this Court dismiss the plaintiff's complaint with prejudice for failure to prosecute and deny as moot the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Although the magistrate judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [dkt. #11] is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

It is further ORDERED that the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [dkt. #7] is DENIED AS MOOT.

______________

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on November 1, 2012.

______________

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

Gitler v. City of Oak Park

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 1, 2012
Case Number 12-10245 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Gitler v. City of Oak Park

Case Details

Full title:PAT GITLER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF OAK PARK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 1, 2012

Citations

Case Number 12-10245 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 1, 2012)