From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gist v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 11, 2013
504 F. App'x 918 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2013-1127

04-11-2013

DAVID L. GIST, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York in case no. 09-CV-1361, Senior Judge Neal P. McCurn.

Before PROST, MOORE and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

ORDER

The court considers whether this appeal should be dismissed or transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The United States indicates that dismissal is appropriate. David L. Gist, Sr. appears to indicate that transfer is appropriate.

Gist appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York which dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his complaint of medical malpractice against a Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility.

Gist filed his notice of appeal in November 2012, more than eleven months after the district court entered judgment. When the United States is a party, the notice of appeal from a district court decision must be filed within 60 days of entry of judgment or order appealed from. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). The statutory deadline for taking an appeal to this court is jurisdictional, mandatory, and cannot be waived. See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). Gist's notice of appeal is untimely.

This court is a court of limited jurisdiction, which does not include jurisdiction in this matter. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, when an appeal is filed in a court that determines that it lacks jurisdiction, "the court shall if it is in the interest of justice, transfer such action or appeal to any other such court in which the action or appeal could have been brought at the time it was filed or noticed." However, since Gist's appeal is untimely, a transfer would not be in the interest of justice and instead dismissal is warranted.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) All other motions are denied as moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

____________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s26


Summaries of

Gist v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 11, 2013
504 F. App'x 918 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Gist v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. GIST, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

504 F. App'x 918 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Piccone v. Matal

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). Under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Mr. Piccone had…