From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GIST v. CON ED

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 2010
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 50155 (N.Y. App. Term 2010)

Opinion

2009-525 K C.

Decided January 29, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (George J. Silver, J.), entered August 13, 2008. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the action.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed without costs

PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., WESTON and RIOS, JJ.


Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover for damage to her vehicle allegedly caused by defendant's negligence. After a nonjury trial, the Civil Court dismissed the action. A review of the record on appeal indicates that there is support for the court's finding that it was plaintiff's actions or failure to act that caused the damage to her vehicle.

In view of the foregoing, we find that substantial justice has been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law (CCA 1804, 1807). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Pesce, P.J., Weston and Rios, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

GIST v. CON ED

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 2010
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 50155 (N.Y. App. Term 2010)
Case details for

GIST v. CON ED

Case Details

Full title:MARION GIST, Appellant, v. CON ED, Respondent

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 29, 2010

Citations

2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 50155 (N.Y. App. Term 2010)
907 N.Y.S.2d 100