From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Girmaye v. Hodge

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Mar 1, 2022
No. 329-2021 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. Mar. 1, 2022)

Opinion

329-2021

03-01-2022

GIRMA GIRMAYE, et al. v. THOMAS HODGE, et al.


Circuit Court for Montgomery County Case No. 471110-V

Graeff, Ripken, Wright, Alexander, Jr. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ.

OPINION [*]

PER CURIAM 1

After Girma Girmaye, appellant, defaulted on her Deed of Trust home loan, appellees, the Substitute Trustees, filed an order to docket foreclosure in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. Ms. Girmaye's home was sold at a foreclosure auction to Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee Under the Indenture Relating to IMH Assets Corp., Collateralized Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2005-8 (Deutsche Bank). The circuit court ratified the sale in February 2020. Ms. Girmaye appealed from the ratification order, contending that appellees had lacked standing to foreclose on her home because they brought the foreclosure action using documents provided by Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, which, she claimed, was "a non-existing Legal entity, who was forced to dissolve by the Maryland State Regulators." This Court affirmed, holding that her claim was not preserved as it had not been raised in the circuit court. See Girmaye v. Hodge, et al., No. 2470, Sept. Term 2019 (filed Mar. 9, 2021).

Appellees are Thomas Hodge, Melissa Alcocer, Brennan Ferguson, Christine Johnson, Jeana McMurray, and Robert Oliveri.

In March 2021, Deutsche Bank filed a motion for judgment of possession of the property. Ms. Girmaye did not file an opposition or response to that motion. After the court granted the motion for judgment of possession, Ms. Girmaye filed the instant appeal, raising the same claim that she raised in her appeal from the ratification order. However, as was the case in her last appeal, Ms. Girmaye's contention that appellees lacked standing is not preserved for appellate review as it was not raised in the circuit court. Therefore, we will not address it for the first time on appeal. See Maryland Rule 8-131(a) (noting that an 2 appellate court will ordinarily not decide any issue "unless it plainly appears by the record to have been raised in or decided by the trial court").

Moreover, as we noted in Ms. Girmaye's first appeal, although the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation previously issued a Cease and Desist Order to Ocwen, the parties executed a Settlement Agreement and Order in February 2018 resolving the charges. Ocwen was not forced to dissolve as part of that agreement. Ocwen did file a Certificate of Cancellation canceling its business registration in Maryland on August 30, 2019. However, that appears to be because Ocwen merged with PHH Mortgage Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, effective June 1, 2019. PHH Mortgage Corporation currently has an active business license in Maryland.

JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY AFFIRMED. COSTS TO BE PAID BY APPELLANT. 3

[*] This is an unreported opinion, and it may not be cited in any paper, brief, motion, or other document filed in this Court or any other Maryland Court as either precedent within the rule of stare decisis or as persuasive authority. Md. Rule 1-104.


Summaries of

Girmaye v. Hodge

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Mar 1, 2022
No. 329-2021 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. Mar. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Girmaye v. Hodge

Case Details

Full title:GIRMA GIRMAYE, et al. v. THOMAS HODGE, et al.

Court:Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Mar 1, 2022

Citations

No. 329-2021 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. Mar. 1, 2022)