Here, the value of each tranche of Lundberg's awards was immediately knowable when owed, and his RSUs were not unique. In re Estate of Balk, 138 A.3d 572 ( N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div. 2016), and Girardot v. Chemours Co., 2018 WL 1472337 (Del. Super. Mar. 26, 2018), support Solar's argument, not Lundberg's. Lundberg cited these cases in support of the proposition that "[t]he continuing breach principle is often applied in the context of 'installment' contracts, not unlike the RSU Agreements ....").
Here, the value of each tranche of Lundberg's awards was immediately knowable when owed, and his RSUs were not unique. In re Estate of Balk, 138 A.3d 572 ( N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div. 2016), and Girardot v. Chemours Co., 2018 WL 1472337 (Del. Super. Mar. 26, 2018), support Solar's argument, not Lundberg's. Lundberg cited these cases in support of the proposition that "[t]he continuing breach principle is often applied in the context of 'installment' contracts, not unlike the RSU Agreements ....").
Accord, e.g., Turner v. Diamond Shamrock Chem. Co., 1987 WL 17175, at *2 (Del. Feb. 8, 1897) (applying Section 8111's one-year limitation period to a claim arising under Section 1108 of the Delaware Wage Payment and Collection Act ("DWPCA")); Girardot v. Chemours Co., 2018 WL 1472337, at *3 (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 26, 2018) ("Section 8111 of Title 10 of the Delaware Code states that any claim for wages for work or any other benefits arising from such work expires 1 year from the accruing of the cause of action on which such action is based. This one-year statute of limitations applies to DWPCA claims.