finding failure to prove any cost deductions where infringer's cost data is "incomplete and contradictory"
Summary of this case from Ducks Unlimited, Inc. v. Boondux, LLCNo. 00-55044.
Filed August 24, 2000.
Appeal from C.D.Cal.
Reversed.
finding failure to prove any cost deductions where infringer's cost data is "incomplete and contradictory"
Summary of this case from Ducks Unlimited, Inc. v. Boondux, LLCexplaining that "[t]he Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not require that a district court dismiss unknown defendants simply because the plaintiff is unaware of the identity of those defendants at the time of the filing of the complaint."
Summary of this case from Amazon.com, Inc. v. Yongexplaining that "[t]he Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not require that a district court dismiss unknown defendants simply because the plaintiff is unaware of the identity of those defendants at the time of the filing of the complaint."
Summary of this case from Amazon.com, Inc. v. JunIn Eliskalns v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co., 230 F.3d 1366 (9th Cir.2000) (unpublished), the case cited by Plaintiff to support the proposition that the presumption should apply here, the Ninth Circuit explained the limited value of such a presumption.
Summary of this case from Malin v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.Full title:Girard v. Krug Intern. Corp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Date published: Aug 24, 2000
the objective conclusions of the Gwinnett County Medical Examiner based on her autopsy that the Decedent…
Wells v. BNSF Ry. Co.Credit Union v. Shupak, 223 P.3d 863, 874 (Mont. 2009) (The general rule is that the “prevailing party is…