From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gipson v. Veley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 15, 1993
192 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Summary

granting summary judgment to defendants because there was no evidence showing that they actually created or contributed to the dangerous condition that caused plaintiff's accident

Summary of this case from Winegarden v. Conrail, Inc.

Opinion

April 15, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Keegan, J.).


Defendants Richard A. Jones and Delores Jones own real property that adjoins property owned by defendants Lester V. Veley and Phyllis J. Veley and leased to defendant Shirley P. Dubray, doing business as the Limrickville Market Deli (hereinafter the Deli). The two properties are separated by adjoining driveways. On January 17, 1986 plaintiff was walking on the public sidewalk, which abuts the two properties, and as she proceeded on the sidewalk immediately in front of and abutting the Deli's driveway, she slipped and fell on ice, thereby sustaining personal injuries. As a result, plaintiff commenced this negligence action against both property owners and the Deli. After issue was joined and discovery concluded, the Joneses moved for summary judgment. Supreme Court denied the motion and this appeal by the Joneses ensued.

We reverse. The Joneses' duty as landowners was to maintain their property in a reasonably safe condition, exercising reasonable care under the circumstances (see, Basso v Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233, 241). The uncontroverted facts as revealed by this record are that plaintiff fell on ice located on the sidewalk abutting the Deli's property, which was located several feet from the Joneses' property line. Absent evidence that the Joneses actually created or contributed to the dangerous condition that caused the accident, and there is none, the Joneses owed no duty to plaintiff in this regard (see, Christopher v Traditi, 178 A.D.2d 807; cf., Brady v Maloney, 161 A.D.2d 879).

Weiss, P.J., Yesawich Jr., Levine and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, motion granted, summary judgment awarded to defendants Richard A. Jones and Delores Jones and complaint and cross claims dismissed against them.


Summaries of

Gipson v. Veley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 15, 1993
192 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

granting summary judgment to defendants because there was no evidence showing that they actually created or contributed to the dangerous condition that caused plaintiff's accident

Summary of this case from Winegarden v. Conrail, Inc.
Case details for

Gipson v. Veley

Case Details

Full title:MARY GIPSON, Respondent, v. LESTER V. VELEY et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1993

Citations

192 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
596 N.Y.S.2d 548

Citing Cases

Galindo v. Town of Clarkstown

It is well settled that a landowner owes "a duty to exercise reasonable care in maintaining [his or her]…

Winegarden v. Conrail, Inc.

Pls.' Mem. of Law, at 4. Such conjectural evidence is inadequate to raise a triable issue of fact that…