From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gipson v. Schmist

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2012
1:11-cv-02004 GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)

Opinion

1:11-cv-02004 GBC (PC)

01-03-2012

WILLIAM GIPSON, Plaintiff, v. R. SCHMIST, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(DOCUMENT #6)

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On December 29, 2011, plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of these documents reveals that plaintiff is unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Gipson v. Schmist

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2012
1:11-cv-02004 GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Gipson v. Schmist

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM GIPSON, Plaintiff, v. R. SCHMIST, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 3, 2012

Citations

1:11-cv-02004 GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)