Gipbsin v. Kernan

Full title: CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 5, 2013

2:12-cv-0556 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2013)

Opinion

CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-0556 DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 5, 2013

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 27, 2013, the court screened plaintiff's amended complaint and addressed a number of his pending motions, including his motion for a temporary restraining order ("TRO"). However, in the court's order clause, the court inadvertently omitted reference to its ruling on plaintiff's motion for a TRO. Therefore, to clarify, for the reasons stated in the court's August 27. 2013 order, plaintiff's motion for a TRO will be denied as moot.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a TRO (Doc. No. 39) is denied as moot.