From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giovinco v. Mendoza-Powers

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 16, 2008
1:07-cv-00585-LJO-TAG (HC), (DOCUMENT #11) (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2008)

Opinion

1:07-cv-00585-LJO-TAG (HC), (DOCUMENT #11).

May 16, 2008


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE THIRTY DAY DEADLINE


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On May 14, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion for a 60-day extension of time to file a traverse. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's motion for an extension of time is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:

A. Petitioner is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order in which to file a traverse.

B. Petitioner's request for more than 30 days extension of time is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Giovinco v. Mendoza-Powers

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 16, 2008
1:07-cv-00585-LJO-TAG (HC), (DOCUMENT #11) (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2008)
Case details for

Giovinco v. Mendoza-Powers

Case Details

Full title:FRANK LORENZO GIOVINCO, Petitioner, v. KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 16, 2008

Citations

1:07-cv-00585-LJO-TAG (HC), (DOCUMENT #11) (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2008)