From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giorlando v. Stuyvesant Town Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1957
4 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

June 24, 1957

Present — Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint at the close of his case. Plaintiff, an employee of the general contractor, was injured when he fell through an unguarded incinerator opening in the floor of the building being constructed for defendant, the owner. There was no proof whatever that the defendant retained any supervision or control over the construction. Defendant's liability is predicated solely on a violation of the duty to plank over the floor, allegedly imposed on it by subdivision 4 of section 241 Lab. of the Labor Law. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The uncontradicted proof in the record establishes that work was in progress in and around the opening through which plaintiff fell, and that the work could not have been performed if the opening had been covered. Under those circumstances, we are of the opinion that the statute did not require such opening to be covered and that there was, consequently, no violation of the statutory duty to provide safeguards. (Cf. Ithaca Trust Co. v. Driscoll Bros. Co., 169 App. Div. 377, affd. 220 N.Y. 617. ) We therefore do not reach the question whether the provisions of section 241 are applicable to an owner who has retained no supervision or control over the construction.


Summaries of

Giorlando v. Stuyvesant Town Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1957
4 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

Giorlando v. Stuyvesant Town Corporation

Case Details

Full title:SALVATORE GIORLANDO, Appellant, v. STUYVESANT TOWN CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1957

Citations

4 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Citing Cases

Martin v. Siegfried Constr. Co.

In such event the space occupied by the sloping ramp beams was reasonably required for proper construction…

Vivian v. J.W. Enterprises, Inc.

There was no suspension of activity; the work was being performed alternately or in relays by employees of…