From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giorgi v. Union Free School District No. 32

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 10, 1989
152 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

July 10, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting permission to the plaintiffs' engineer to drill a small hole in the defendant's premises (see, Castro v Alden Leeds, Inc., 116 A.D.2d 549; Di Piano v Yamaha Motor Corp., 106 A.D.2d 367). The plaintiffs made a sufficient showing that due to alteration of the premises, their engineer needed to drill the hole in order to take an accurate measurement of the height of the ramp from which the infant plaintiff fell. Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Giorgi v. Union Free School District No. 32

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 10, 1989
152 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Giorgi v. Union Free School District No. 32

Case Details

Full title:ANNMARIE GIORGI, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, CATHERINE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 10, 1989

Citations

152 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
543 N.Y.S.2d 723

Citing Cases

Micro Chemical, Inc. v. Lextron, Inc.

I am aware of cases in which alterations were permitted during an inspection. See, e.g.,Giorgi v. Union Free …

Eastchester v. Lawns

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents. In its order entered October 13, 2006 the…