From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ginsburg v. Pintel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

April, 1927.


Judgment directed for defendants, without costs, upon agreed statement of facts. From the decision of this court heretofore rendered, that the present case is not a proper one for a lis pendens, it necessarily follows that a lien could not be impressed upon the property in question as the result of the action, for, if this were possible, the lis pendens would be proper. Kelly, P.J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ginsburg v. Pintel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Ginsburg v. Pintel

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN GINSBURG, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES J. PINTEL and LOUIS BILOWITZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1927

Citations

220 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)