From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ginsburg v. Gross

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Nov 8, 1956
138 N.E.2d 270 (Mass. 1956)

Opinion

November 8, 1956.

Edward M. Joyce, for the plaintiff.

Thomas F. Maher, ( Samuel M. Flaksman with him,) for the defendants.


Exceptions overruled. This is an action of tort for personal injuries and property damage incurred in a collision of automobiles. The jury returned verdicts for the defendants. The plaintiff alleges exceptions relating to the charge and to the denial of his motion for a new trial. The bill of exceptions, which lacks a statement that it contains all the material evidence, is fatally defective. Irving v. Bonjorno, 327 Mass. 516, 518. Schnepel v. Kidd, 332 Mass. 137, 138. In fact, it contains no statement at all of any evidence. The plaintiff has not satisfied the burden resting upon the excepting party to show error. Posell v. Herscovitz, 237 Mass. 513, 517. Donahue v. Kenney, 330 Mass. 9, 12.


Summaries of

Ginsburg v. Gross

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Nov 8, 1956
138 N.E.2d 270 (Mass. 1956)
Case details for

Ginsburg v. Gross

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD GINSBURG vs. ALBERT S. GROSS another

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Nov 8, 1956

Citations

138 N.E.2d 270 (Mass. 1956)
334 Mass. 709

Citing Cases

Mendum v. Massachusetts Bay Transp. Auth

Schnepel v. Kidd, 332 Mass. 137, 138 (1954). Ginsburg v. Gross, 334 Mass. 709 (1956). On this evidence we…

Kurker v. National Grange Insurance Company

Further evidence is not contained in the report, an omission which is undoubtedly the consequence of the…